Releasing the Truth

Digging for knowledge…

Real reasons behind antitheist movement…

Aldous Huxley and the meaning of the world


I had motives for not wanting the world to have a meaning; consequently assumed that it had none, and was able without any difficulty to find satisfying reasons for this assumption. The philosopher who finds no meaning in the world is not concerned exclusively with a problem in metaphysics, he is also concerned to prove that there is no valid reason why he personally should not do as he wants to do, or why his friends should not seize political power and govern in the way that they find most advantegous to themselves…For myself, as, no doubt, for most of my contemporaries, the philosophy of meaningless was essentially an instrument of liberation. The liberation we desired was simultaneously liberation from a certain political and economic system and liberation from a certain system of morality. We objected to the morality because it interfered with our sexual freedom; we objected to the political and economic system because it was unjust. The supporters of these systems claimed that in some way they embodied the meaning (a Christian meaning, they insisted) of the world. There was one admirably simple method of confuting these people and at the same time justifying ourselves in our political and erotical revolt: we could deny that the world had any meaning whatsoever.” (Ends and Means, 1937)

Wow! This quotation summarizes all we need to know about atheism, its actual agenda, and its fanatical aversion to Christianity, traditional customs and moral behavior.

 No wonder, there’s an increasing in their zealous  support of materialistic theories like evolution, big-bang, multiverse, string theory, as well as an world-wide spreading of  “free, critical thinking”, “humanist” movements, even despite the blatant absence of evidences substantially backing up and supporting these naturalistic, anti-theist theories, and the bankruptcy of the mentioned ideologies.

Amusing to see them taking side against Christianity, faith, belief in God, all the while (as Rebecca Watson, atheist blogger can well report) holding quite a immoral, libertine behavior, from which we can only conclude that atheism, godlessness is very dangerous to society, and the bad fruits of that can be seem anywhere. Even the hailed Nordic nations, such as Sweden, Finland, Denmark, Norway, claimed to be nations with high human development, they’re actually far from that! Depression (and other mental illness) only increases, suicide and attempts rates are very high, alcoholism, drug addiction, divorces, racism, neo-Nazi movements, child and elderly abuse, domestic violence and other social problems simply insist on increasing!

See more details here, here and here… Also: counterpunch, alternet

Not even the science is spared by anti-God agendas!

‘We take the side of science in spite of the patent
absurdity of some of its constructs, in spite of its failure
to fulfill many of its extravagant promises of health and
life, in spite of the tolerance of the scientific community
for unsubstantiated just-so stories, because we have a
prior commitment, a commitment to materialism.
It is not that the methods and institutions of science
somehow compel us to accept a material explanation of
the phenomenal world, but, on the contrary, that we are
forced by our a priori adherence to material causes to
create an apparatus of investigation and a set of concepts
that produce material explanations, no matter how
counter-intuitive, no matter how mystifying to the
uninitiated. Moreover, that materialism is an absolute, for
we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door.”
Richard Lewontin, Billions and billions of demons (review of The Demon-
Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Darkby Carl Sagan,
1997), The New York Review, p. 31, 9 January 1997.

 

Dr Michael Ruse, Canadian, science philosopher affirmed:
‘at some very basic level, evolution as a scientific theory
makes a commitment to a kind of naturalism, namely that at
some level one is going to exclude miracles and these sorts
of things, come what may.’
‘evolution, akin to religion, involves making certain a
priori or metaphysical assumptions, which at some level
cannot be proven empirically.’

What about abiogenesis?

 

“The belief that life on earth arose spontaneously from nonliving
matter, is simply a matter of faith in strict
reductionism and is based entirely on ideology.”

Hubert P. Yockey, 1992. Information Theory and Molecular Biology,
Cambridge University Press, UK, p. 284.

 

Another intriguing admission:

 

‘Even if all the data point to an intelligent designer, such an
hypothesis is excluded from science because it is not
naturalistic’
Todd, S.C., correspondence to Nature 401(6752):423, 30 Sept. 1999.

 

More:

‘It is no more heretical to say the Universe displays purpose,
as Hoyle has done, than to say that it is pointless, as Steven
Weinberg has done. Both statements are metaphysical and
outside science. Yet it seems that scientists are permitted by
their own colleagues to say metaphysical things about lack
of purpose and not the reverse. This suggests to me that
science, in allowing this metaphysical notion, sees itself as
religion and presumably as an atheistic religion (if you can
have such a thing).’
•Shallis, M., In the eye of a storm, New Scientist, pp. 42–43,
January 19, 1984.

 

“Never in the history of man has so terrific a calamity befallen the race as that which all who look may now behold advancing as a deluge, black with destruction, resistless in might, uprooting our most cherished hopes, engulfing our most precious creed, and burying our highest life in mindless desolation . . The flood-gates of infidelity are open, and Atheism overwhelming is upon us.”—*George Romanes, A Candid Examination of Theism (1878).

 

Evolution, neo-atheism’s backbone, plays a great role on it:

“As feared by this great man of science, the evolutionary idea of civilization has grown into a practical method of thought and code of conduct, affecting the reasoning and actions of every part of the human race. Human conduct is modelled on the philosophy that finds current acceptance.”—H. Enoch, Evolution or Creation (1986), pp. 144-145.

 

“Our own generation has lived to see the inevitable result of evolutionary teaching—the result that Sedgwick foresaw as soon as he had read the Origin. Mussolini’s attitude was completely dominated by evolution. In public utterances, he repeatedly used the Darwinian catchwords while he mocked at perpetual peace, lest it hinder the evolutionary process. In Germany, it was the same. Adolf Hitler’s mind was captivated by evolutionary teaching—probably since the time he was a boy. Evolutionary ideas, quite undisguised, lie at the basis of all that is the worst in Mein Kamp and his public speeches.”— R.E.D. Clark, Darwin: Before and After (1948), p. 115.

 

“I am haunted by a conviction that the nihilistic philosophy which so-called educated opinion chose to adopt following the publication of the Origin of Species committed mankind to a course of automatic self-destruction. A doomsday was then set ticking.”—Sir Fred Hoyle, The Intelligent Universe (1983), p. 9. [Hoyle is a renowned British Astrophysicist.] (no surprise Sir Hoyle was denied the Nobel prize…)

 

“Darwin’s books were quickly translated into all the earth’s main languages, and the political leaders of the various motions began using the Darwinian catchwords to justify their expansionist ambitions. The influence in Germany was especially profound. There, the atheistic biologist Ernst Haeckel embarked on a popularization campaign fully comparable to that of Huxley in England. The philosopher Nietzsche, with his doctrine of the ‘superman,’ was also greatly influenced by Darwin, though he thought Darwin did not go far enough in promoting the militaristic and racist implications of his theories. Darwinistic imperialism had great impact on the policies of Bismarck and even more so on those of Adolph Hitler.”H.M. Morris, History of Modern Christianity (1984, p. 47.

Altruism? Love thy neighbor? Not under the optics of evolution/materialism:

“Anything that has evolved by natural selection should be selfish.”—*Life: How Did it Get Here? (1985), p. 177.

 

“Mankind struggles upwards, in which millions are trampled to death, that thousands may mount on their bodies.”—*Clara Lucas Balfour (1808-1878), quoted in Asimov’s Book of Science and Nature Quotations, p. 88 [chapter on “Evolution”].

 

“Monism” is the theory that all reality consists only of matter. This teaching is an important basis of atheism.

“Of all the forerunners of Hitler in Germany—Hegel, Comte, Nietzsche, Bernhardi, and others—the most significant was certainly Ernst Haeckel, the atheistic founder of the Monist League and the most vigorous promoter of both biological Darwinism and social Darwinism in continental Europe in the late-nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.”H.M. Morris, Long War Against God (1989), pp. 77-78.

 

“Marx and Engels were doctrinaire evolutionists, and so have all Communists been ever since. Since atheism is a basic tenet of Marxism in general, and Soviet Communism in particular, it is obvious that evolution must be the number one tenet of communism. Lenin and Trotsky and Stalin were all atheistic evolutionists, and so are today’s Communist leaders. In fact, they have to be in order ever to get to be Communist leaders!”Henry Morris, Long War Against God (1989), p. 85.

See more on:http://www.pathlights.com/ce_encyclopedia/sci-ev/sci_vs_ev_19.htm

________________________________________________________

If we think for a little, we can come to a sad, sorrow  series of “coincidences”: right after the increasing in secular, godless movements, prior, during and after the “Enlightenment”, with Engels, Hegel, Nietzsche, Feuerbach, Schopenhauer, Marx, Lenin, and other so-called “brilliant intellectuals”, we’ve had: I World War (up to 15 million deaths), II World War (+66 mi deaths), French and other bloody revolutions (just the French one has been killed almost 600 k), fascism, nazism (Courtois: 25,000,000), communism (75 t0 113 millions deaths)… So, we can conclude that atheism isn’t the solution; all the way around, it’s actually the worst aggravating for social problems, human life.

God bless you!

21 responses to “Real reasons behind antitheist movement…

  1. thunderhawkbolt April 7, 2013 at 21:24

    Talk about a straw-man. Hitler, by his own admission, was a Christian. Communism, fascism, and atheism are not connected. Since atheism has no tenets, it certainly does not equate to any financial or ruling system. And, you are ignoring all of the deaths on the hands of the religious before the Enlightenment. But, good cherry-picking and misrepresenting history; I have to commend you on that.

    • adonizedek April 11, 2013 at 00:52

      Sorry, but it’s too much coincidence that, a few centuries after the spread of atheism world-wide, so many evil things has happened all over the world… Two World-Wars man! Atheist state communism, killing that much.. And now, we’re deep in mud, immorality, violence, disrespect towards traditions, elders, marriage, woman..

      I just support the christian side, and that one truly based on Gospels,that’s the only factor in which a person can be really considered CHRISTIAN.. If someone just said that out of mouth, but his/her behavior mostly deny the Gospel teachings, we can certainly discard such people as a true follower of Christ..
      Peace! Be welcome!

      • thunderhawkbolt April 11, 2013 at 00:58

        I hold that we area million times more moral now than we were then. We’ve dumped Biblically mandated slavery and treating women like property. The laws of the US have evolved to a place where everyone is treated equally under the law (in theory anyway). These things don’t come from religion. If a person were to practice a Biblical version of morality, they would be sitting on death row, and for good reason.

    • adonizedek April 11, 2013 at 21:38

      “I hold that we area million times more moral now than we were then. We’ve dumped Biblically mandated slavery and treating women like property. The laws of the US have evolved to a place where everyone is treated equally under the law”.

      Yes, so moral that even the adultery is no longer considered a crime… If you think that a world full of porn, rebel teenagers, high rate of divorces, child abuse, domestic violence, drugs, greed, self-centrism, etc, is something close to moral, there’s nothing I can see then.. Are you American? Try that, dear: http://endoftheamericandream.com/

      Well, be free to share you points, God bless you🙂

      • thunderhawkbolt April 11, 2013 at 21:44

        So, you believe that adulterers should be jailed? Or do you stick to Biblical rules that they should be murdered? Just wondering.

        All of the things you mentioned are the exact things your grandparents said about the generation after them… And your great grandparents before them. There are writings that are over a thousand years old that bemoan the same thing. With us, we now have 24 hour coverage of everything that happens anywhere in the world; of course we’re going to see the world as a worse place than it was back when we could claim ignorance. We are better, not worse.

      • adonizedek April 12, 2013 at 01:17

        It’s just an example, alright? The moral is decaying so visibly that things like that happen to occur😦
        Adulterers shouldn’t be murdered, anyway, they commit a sin, for a stupid reason of course, which can bring eternal consequences to them if fo not repent and cease such practice..

        Yes, any older person can easily describe the moral decay, violence, drug, fear increasing..
        I sincerely doubt that past generation might be as rebel, disobedient to parents, selfish, sexual addicted, as the present one is… But, don’t forget, that, since the falling, mankind tended to unrighteous, sinful works, yet, we now witness a alarming, astonishing global phenomena😦

        Peace!

      • thunderhawkbolt April 12, 2013 at 03:29

        You made it through an entire post without addressing even one of the things I said. Congrats.

    • adonizedek May 7, 2013 at 11:40

      “So, you believe that adulterers should be jailed? Or do you stick to Biblical rules that they should be murdered? Just wondering.”

      Whatever, man, the biggest problem is the sin itself, whether they are jailed or not, the sin, if not redeemed by Jesus’ blood, will cause them eternal suffering…
      Nonetheless, every immorality, iniquity can be harmful to people even here on life.. The absurd perversion that is so common and welcomed today has brought to the world numberless STD’s, AIDS, aborts, rape, porn addiction, why do you stick with that?
      IN the supposed name of “freedom”, modernity, secular people is taking side with things that are actually destroying humankind…

      Take a look in this blog: http://subversivethinking.blogspot.com its author isn’t religious, and presents quite well the problems and bankruptcy found in atheist/skeptic/humanist movements..
      God bless you, dear ^^

      • thunderhawkbolt May 7, 2013 at 13:54

        “whatever, man.”

        The above statement shows that you have not thought your position through to its logical conclusion, and that you are comfortable in your misstatements. That means I would be wasting my time in conversing with you. I wish you the best.

      • adonizedek May 7, 2013 at 14:13

        I said that because my opinion is totally irrelevant, it doesn’t change a thing in our world (and it’s not my pretension to change anything), I have zero influence in laws and constitution, so what’s your point with such question? Peace!!!!

      • adonizedek May 7, 2013 at 14:14

        You said that the things today are far better than in the past, right?

        What about that: http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=1c4_1346382415

      • thunderhawkbolt May 7, 2013 at 14:19

        Pointing to one incident (which may or may not be true) from a very fringe element in no way sets a precedent or indicates a trend. Wanna try again?

      • adonizedek May 7, 2013 at 14:30

        I could spend the entire day easily posting to you thousands of examples of the “sweet” fruits which the secularist agenda is bringing to the world.. What’s your personal reason to simply overlook it all?

      • thunderhawkbolt May 7, 2013 at 14:52

        I don’t overlook anything, and I work to make things better every day. Why do you deny all the wonderful things the break with your proposed theocracy has brought?

      • adonizedek May 7, 2013 at 14:59

        I don’t defend a “theocracy”, dear…
        I’m against the idea of religious people influencing politics, imposing their faith by law, force.. But we must watch and defend the good, honest points in society, combating immorality and other vile things that some groups wants to impose over it..

      • thunderhawkbolt May 7, 2013 at 15:06

        The problem with your statement is; you claim to get you morality from the most immoral book ever written, so I find it hard to take you seriously when you speak of defending it.

      • adonizedek May 7, 2013 at 15:36

        OK, no surprise you are one of these who hold such a wrong vision towards the bible😦

        Anyway, I personally search and read the bible, and, under the proper context, each delicate point is solved..
        Everything lies on the fact that God is a Holy, righteous Being Who can’t suffer people committing unrighteousness, violence, iniquity..

      • thunderhawkbolt May 7, 2013 at 15:51

        There is no context in which slavery is ok. There is no context in which women should ever be considered property… should I go on… because with the deity sanctioned rape, genocide, slavery, and general evilness in that book, this could take days.

      • adonizedek May 9, 2013 at 12:52

        Hello! I could write a extensive text depicting the question of servitude/slavery in bible…
        If you look well, you’ll notice the blatant difference between OT slavery and that of colonialism time, African slavery in America, Europe, etc..
        Without state welfare programs, nor any kind of benefit, people back then have no choice other than sell themselves or their relatives (or starving to death), as they livelihood dependent on agriculture, livestock, things that demands abundant water, climate conditions, etc.. If it happen to occur a drought, or they were stolen by bandits, etc, they livelihood would be totally lost.. Radical solution? Selling themselves as slaves, servants..

        At least in Israel, they could have a bunch of benefits, manumission if they were injured by their masters, if they (the servants) disrelished the treatment received from their masters, they could flee, and whoever find them, should never give them back to their former masters:

        “You shall not deliver to his master a servant who is escaped from his master to you:” Deuter. 23.15

        This is just a little summary of the things that shows the bible is not condoning slavery at all, so, forget that picture of African slaves suffering like animals during colonization, this has nothing to do with the “slavery” during Israel times, again, we just need to pick the right context, and sometimes take a look in the history behind some biblical events..

        I really have no idea as to what are you referring to with “women being considered property”, unless, of course, you are talking about the Quran🙂

        Sanctioning RAPE? GENOCIDE? Why do the skeptics never research the things properly, but, only repeat these same “points” as a mantra? I’m quite tired of explaining these same questions again and again, skeptics simply repeat that without any slight interest in find a explanation for them..

        Well, ignore my bad english, I hope I’ve helped you to change at least a bit of this prejudice against the bible, an unfortunate increasing phenomena, more people are choosing to see the bible like this, thus rejecting God’s word, which is resulting in all the evil things which are occurring in the whole world day by day.. And getting even worse as the time passes… Peace, man!

      • thunderhawkbolt May 10, 2013 at 11:04

        Well, I’m tired of seeing people attempt to justify their cherry-picking; peace out.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: